Lighthouses are planned but will take some time as they will use the same system as cooling towers. This means it's a bit complicated but gives a good variety of results.

Kinda. I can't detect if anything is placed over my object so I really have no option to make my mod compatible with others. On the other hand, other add-ons can add exclusion rectangles that will remove objects in all sceneries that are below them. You can add them too by creating new scenery and adding it between mine and the local add-on.

Thanks for that report. It's very odd. My system should remove all objects like this from within airports. Looks like a bug of some kind. I'll try to fix the code for the next version (or at least manually correct this one). The next update is planned for January.

I'm glad you're having fun with it 😊

Hi and thank you.

Did you check out if freeware LICJ have these lights? These lights are not marked in OpenStreetmaps and are quite specific. Another thing is to make proper lights visible from a large distance you need to work at an airport. Those special lights are not available for general scenery and I do not modify or add airports in my add-ons.

If I were you I'd contact developers of LICJ that are available at flightsim.to. Maybe they could help.

This way I'd need to remove every object that is in any add-on available. My add-on should be treated more like an extended autogen. I can't detect if any object loads over mine, so I can't tell if I should display the object or not. On the other hand, sceneries are able to remove objects from other add-ons that were loaded before them. It just needs exclusion rectangles. Many add-ons has those and they are compatible with We Love VFR. Meaning they just exclude my objects. I can't do it the other way around.

It's more a question of how accurate and up to date are OSM data vs Bing sat images are. The cases you're talking about are usually construction sites that started after Bing made their sat images. I do not include the latest construction sites for that reason but sometimes sat imagery is 5-7 years old. It would be possible to detect if the construction site is on the old sat image by colour, but it would require access to Bing API which is expensive.

Actually, you gave me an idea... there is a chance I could switch off cranes standing on grass based on the type of surface BUT it would require making them simobjects instead of normal static objects. I'm afraid that it could be more taxing on the sim and I want to keep the load of my add-ons as low as possible. A tempting idea, but I don't know if it's worth it.

It looks like before it was just pure luck that it was realistic as there are not much data about that tower 😊 Some small detail must have changed and the random generator picked the wrong values this time. I'll make sure to make it realistic for the next update. Probably at the beginning of 2022.

Thanks for the report. I've totally changed exclusion system and it looks like it still needs some tweaking. Usually cases like this occur when osm data was updated between Asobo downloading it (at least 2 years ago) and me using it. Will check that place out and fix it for the next version.

Thank you. I will remove it in the next version.

I didn't get crash reports before, but I had just a similar report with the region 2. Do you use the beta version of msfs or the normal one? Did you try the We Love VFR No Effects version? Do crashes occur every time in that place? Did you try without other add-ons installed? Do you have both regions installed or only one?

Antennas, chimneys, obstacles, and more are already there. I guess it's the flightsim.to search issue.

Thanks. It's fun to research and create new objects. Don't tell anyone, but there will be new add-on available before New Year 😉

Do you have any other add-ons? Is your We Love VFR Region 1 up to date? Can you replicate it every time? Did you try it in the same conditions without We Love VFR?

I've tried it and had no issues https://imgur.com/a/9wx2XOR